Three senior executives left Flipkart in early June, adding to a wave of departures that has raised questions about the e‑commerce platform’s leadership stability as it prepares for a postponed IPO.
The executives who exited are Kanchan Mishra, vice president of smartphones, Amit Sachan, vice president of product and technology, and Kamal Chopra, vice president of corporate, according to a Moneycontrol report. Mishra had been with the company for more than a decade, while Sachan and Chopra served four and five years respectively.
Their resignations come as Flipkart wrestles with multiple challenges: pressure from parent Walmart to prioritize profitability before a public listing, heavy investment in the quick‑commerce service Flipkart Minutes, and growing employee discontent over the liquidity of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs). Sources told Inc42 that some of the departing leaders left because they could not see a clear path to cash out their vested options.
ESOP liquidity dispute widens
Former senior staff have escalated the ESOP issue to Walmart’s board. Earlier this month, ex‑Myntra chief Mukesh Bansal, former chief business officer Ankit Nagori and former chief financial officer Sanjay Baweja wrote to the board seeking a full cash‑out of their vested options after leaving the firm.
Employees had hoped an IPO would provide an exit route for their shares, but the listing has been repeatedly delayed, leaving staff uncertain about when they can realise the value of their holdings. The uncertainty is influencing retention decisions, especially for executives who have been at Flipkart for only a short period.
Leadership turnover amid strategic shifts
Flipkart employs roughly 30 vice presidents and more than a dozen senior vice presidents. While the recent exits represent a small fraction of that pool, the pattern signals underlying dissatisfaction. The company continues to expand its quick‑commerce and food‑delivery businesses, which require substantial capital outlays.
Walmart has reportedly urged Flipkart to focus on profit generation before pursuing a public offering, a stance that may further affect morale and retention.